National diaper sampling report: 7 models have unqualified penetration performance and 3 models have safety problems

From 0 to 3 years old, babies spend about 1,000 days and nights intimately with diapers. Is the quality of this close companion? Is it comfortable for the baby? Is the absorption performance good? This is an issue that every parent and child care about. In December 2018, 'Consumer Report' collected sampling data of diapers (including adult diapers) from industry and commerce and quality supervision units across the country from 2016 to 2018. The results showed that Jiabei Shuang, Kraft Xiong, Dai Dai Qin, Qiao Wa 7 other diapers were on the black list due to unqualified penetration performance. In addition, a total of 3 diapers have safety issues, including Qiku, Anerkang and Wanmei. The penetration performance of 7 diapers such as Jiabei Shuang, Kraft Bear, and Generation Pro is not up to standard. Whether the diapers are good or not, penetration performance is very important. Structurally, the body of the diaper is thicker and contains an absorbent core layer, which can absorb urine in a large amount and quickly; at the same time, the specially designed 3D embossing on the surface of some diapers can effectively prevent urine reverse seepage; the bottom PE The membrane, while ensuring comfort and ventilation, is also miraculous in preventing urine leakage. So, how to judge whether the penetration performance of diapers is qualified? Regarding penetration performance, my country’s 'GB 28004-2011 Diapers (sheets, pads)' (hereinafter referred to as 'diaper standards') has different regulations for different types of diapers: take common baby diapers as an example, which must meet the slippery penetration ≤ 20mL, re-infiltration volume ≤10.0g, leakage volume ≤0.5g. Relatively speaking, the standard for adult diapers should be looser. Except for the leakage requirements and infant diapers, the slippage volume needs to be ≤30mL, and the re-seepage volume ≤20.0g. For paper urine pads and nursing pads, the above-mentioned standards require that there is no leakage or leakage. Sampling results show that the overall pass rate of penetration performance of diapers on the market is very high. Only Jia Bei Shuang (production date / batch number: valid until 2019-03-14/SBL2050258), Kraft Bear (production date / batch number: 2017-10-11), Hua Zijiao (production date / batch number: 2018-03- 18), on behalf of parents (production date/batch number: 2016-12-05), Qiaowa (production date/batch number: 2016-12-16/161216), Aileai (production date/batch number: 20160913, 20160912), And the adult diapers produced by Qidong Huaxianzi Sanitary Products Co., Ltd.: (production date/batch number: valid until 2020/02/07) and other 7 types of diapers have substandard penetration performance. It can be noticed that the amount of back infiltration in the permeability performance is unqualified. Taking urine as an example, the amount of re-osmosis refers to the amount of urine returned to the surface of the diaper under constant pressure after absorbing urine. If the amount of re-osmosis is too high, it is easy to make the environment inside the diaper damp and airtight, causing discomfort for the baby or adult; second, the urine returned from the re-osmosis will repeatedly contact the skin, causing inflammation and even 'diaper rash.' The total number of Qiku bacteria colonies exceeds the standard, and the pH values u200bu200bof Anerkang and Wanmei are not up to the standard. In addition to performance, safety cannot be ignored. Many mothers are worried about the migrating fluorescent whitening agent in diapers, fearing that this fluorescent dye will harm the delicate skin of the baby. In response to this, in 2017, Jiangxi Quality Supervision conducted inspections of 10 batches of diapers collected from Fujian, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Jiangsu and other places with a focus on migratory fluorescent substances. The results showed that none of the tested samples were detected. This journal also reviewed the data of 565 batches of diapers inspected by industry and commerce and quality supervision from 2016 to 2018, and no products were found to have detected migratory fluorescent substances. It is worth noting that the Qiku baby diapers (production date/batch number: valid until 2018-12-21/C690) were found to exceed the total number of bacterial colonies. The total number of bacterial colonies is a 'hygiene indexmy country's 'GB 15979-2002 Hygienic Standard for Disposable Hygiene Products' stipulates that the total bacterial colony of ordinary diapers must be ≤200cfu/g, and that of disinfection diapers must be ≤20cfu/g. The diaper touches the private parts of the human body. Once the sanitary standard is unqualified, it is easy to infect the skin and cause inflammation. In addition, two products were found to have unqualified pH. They are Anerkang adult diapers (production date/batch number: valid until 20200317) and Wanmei multifunctional nursing pads (production date/batch number: 2016-12-26). The pH value is an important indicator for assessing the skin-friendly degree of diapers. The sebum membrane of the human body's surface skin is weakly acidic, between 5.5 and 6.5. Diapers, which have a pH value close to that of the skin, are relatively more skin-friendly and help protect the surface sebum film. The diaper standard stipulates that the pH value of this type of product must be in the range of 4.0 to 8.0. Using diapers with substandard pH values u200bu200bmay damage the sebum film on the skin's surface, causing skin discomfort and even bacterial invasion. [Evaluation Preview] After reading the government sampling information, if you still have questions about the diapers you are using, or want to know which diapers show performance on the market, please pay attention to the 9 diapers evaluations released by Consumer Reports immediately! Previous post: What is the best time to use diapers? Next post: Baby can change diapers to pull-up pants when babies reach this age, mother should know